<body>

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

Batman: Arkham Asylum

Writer: Grant Morrison
Artist: Dave McKean
Publisher: DC Comics


“But I don’t want to go among mad people,” Alice remarked.
“Oh, you can’t help that,” said the Cat, “we’re all mad here. I’m mad, you’re mad.”
“How do you know I’m mad?” said Alice
“You must be,” said the Cat, “or you wouldn’t have come here.”
–Lewis Carroll (Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland)

In 1989, when the British invasion of comic book writers was well underway, Grant Morrison was tasked to write a 64 page one-shot that grew into the graphic novel, Batman: Arkham Asylum. He was already making his mark, spinning imaginative stories around B-level characters (Animal Man, Doom Patrol) before going on to write a host of other great comic book runs, (DC One Million, JLA, X-Men, All-Star Superman). Before I come off as a complete fanboy, he was also prone to some truly odd ball runs ( I’m still puzzling my way through Invisibles and WE3).

Batman: Arkham Asylum is more a horror comic detailing the dark history of the Elizabeth Arkham Asylum for the Criminally Insane, this “triumph of reason over the irrational.” is where the psychologically disturbed villains that Batman faces (from the Joker to Two-Face) are consigned to between escapes. It almost has the feeling of a Lovecraftian world (one that the word “Arkham” tends to conjure), though this is equally due to Dave McKean’s (Sandman) mix of photography and painting that creates the Gothic home of the insane. In fact, this is the definitive Arkham story.

“Arkham is a looking glass. And we are you.” --Joker

Led by the Joker (the clown prince of psychosis), the inmates have taken over the asylum and have blackmailed Batman into joining them within its walls. Fighting against his own psyche, Batman must jump through their hoops, elude them, and rescue the hostages - all against the backdrop of the story of Dr. Amadeus Arkham, the asylum’s founder. The story is one of a legacy of hate and madness that explores the conceit that a finer line than we feel comfortable with separates the sane from the mad. The madness seems to be contagious as such close proximity to the insane has had an effect on some of the doctors.

“I realized that she was simply trying to protect herself from something in the only way that made sense to her ... mother had been born again, into that other world. A world of fathomless signs and portents. Of magic and terror. And mysterious symbols.” –Dr. Amadeus Arkham

Madness is often associated with paradigm shifts, a change in how we see the world. Experiencing such a shift, living through it, can be quite traumatic - moreso than we might guess at first. We become invested in our worldview; often defining ourselves through them (as much as they often define us). When those (mutual) definitions crumble, so goes our grounding, our sense of reality.

The kingdom of humanity is very much a kingdom of madness. Amadeus Arkham describes his predicament way: “Madness is born in the blood. It is my birthright. My inheritance. My destiny.” He is all too fully aware of the fact that we live in a cycle of death–one of (the lie of) self-sufficiency, fear, doubt, anxiety, broken relationships–with our minds, as one of the doctors described the Joker, filled with “thoughts guided by chaos.” We have this mix of feelings going on within us. This vague confusion and longing, what Augustine called the God-sized hole within each of us. Since we have to fill this void with something, we search and even invent ideas, personas, or things to fill this inner dissatisfaction. And yet, we can’t escape the ache of emptiness.

“I run blindly through the madhouse. And I cannot even pray for I have no God.” –Amadeus Arkham

These can lead to what the Spanish mystic, St. John of the Cross, called dark nights of the soul. And it can be tough finding your way out of them. Not every painful experience falls into that specific category. It refers to something more than simple misfortune, but we can learn much about getting through stormy times by learning about getting through those dark nights.

Overall, the process looks something like this:
-we feel that God is absent and inactive; He’s gone and we’re alone.
-we’ve come to the end of our ability to be in control.
-the familiar (spiritual) practices that we had come to depend on, that usually comforted us, instead
seem hollow and ineffective
-BOOM! We hit a wall.
But it is the feeling that God is not at work, that He has abandoned us, and all of our cries
are going unanswered that causes us the greatest pain.

“I have been shown the path. I must follow where it leads.” –Amadeus Arkham

A lot of times we place our love and faith in the wrong things, or good things that aren’t
the best things - confusing our spiritual ideas with some distorted ideas of God. It’s tough to hold on to faith when all we hear is a deafening silence, yet that is exactly what we must do during such times. Sometimes the dark circumstances are the exact times that God uses to transform us. This is what Batman had to learn (a dark night for the Dark Knight).

Grant Morrison took a cliche (the inmates running the asylum) and spun a dark, satisfying tale from it. While it had become quite the fad to explore Batman as borderline psychotic–starting with Frank Miller’s The Dark Knight Returns–Morrison seriously explores the idea. In the final analysis, this was a solid, creepy story with art that matched the mood of the book - I just don’t think it was worth the price of admission (at least the first time around. The 15th year anniversary edition features a ton of extras that nearly doubles the original’s length and includes an annotated version of the original script). In Batman: Arkham Asylum’s examination of the horror of insanity, and our fear of our own detaching from reality, this is one of Grant Morrison’s more thought-provoking and haunting works.

Labels: ,

15 Comments:

Anonymous maskofloki said...

"Thoughts guided by chaos" - hey Maurice dear, that sounds a bit like the inside of my head!! But there *is* method in all the best madness, and a Lokean never should be scared of a little madness/chaos.. Hence my deciding to stop here and comment, on my browse through your back catalogue..no logical reason. Just a few questions: Do you really think that Morrison in any respect wanted to include a Christian, spiritual "dark night of the soul" message in his story, or was it just late 80s shallow nihilistic tat? Cos I seem to remember the ending as very un-redemptive. (And nothing like what Lewis or Tolkien would have recognised as such.) And the tone just pages of unrelieved dreary driveling. Now, I know according to postmodernistic fashion, it is OK to read practically anything you want into a text, and to a certain extent everyone does this anyway, but I'm just wondering how honest it is. Also: if someone from a different, definite belief system (such as a Muslim - or a Heathen) were to write a work

11:54 AM  
Anonymous maskofloki said...

of fiction, say about their myths, religion, whatever - and a Christian came along and said it had a Christian message? What would then ensue, in our times? (I like to imagine a humorously satisfying Beano-comic-style image of a moving dustcloud with fists and feet sticking out!) Seriously, how does postmodernist etiquette deal with such a situation? Now for my chaotic quantum leap: have you ever come across the steampunk-style fantasy of one China Miéville? His style is creatively chaotic; I think we must have similar minds in certain aspects; though his is much more macabre than mine: should be right up your street then! Perdido Street Station, The Scar, etc. Big in Europe. Pretty enjoyable to read, but the only defect is that despite that, they contain surprisingly little humour. (And that's a flaw in a lot of fantasy - and comics - nowadays! Now Tolkien, always knew how to lighten the tension with Merry and Pippin and the way Gollum talked!) But nowadays of course Terry Pratchett is yer man.

1:17 PM  
Anonymous maskofloki said...

Answers, then, Mo? (Don't forget, chaos-guided minds wish to know!) Hmm: Christians have their own inspirational guides, don't they, like The Purpose-Driven Life? Maybe the Lokean equivalent would be The Chaos -Driven Life? Maybe I should write it - might sell! Well anyway: where comes the purpose-driven part of A.A.? (Boy that book drove me nuts with bored loathing in my mid-twenties! Why does Ennis, sorry, Morrison bother? I asked myself. What is he trying to do or say with these messily reworked characters? Who is encouraging him to do it? Certainly not Loki and his followers... Might be the evil god in YOUR pantheon.. definitely not Jesus. Well?)

3:10 PM  
Anonymous maskofloki said...

?? (Don't forget, England expects - an answer?!!) And there's something wrong with your site: on this page, when one loads the original page with the essay on it, it says "0 comments". Yet click the "post a comment" link and get into the blogger software - there are my comments, all (previously) 3 of them! What gives? Bugs! Call the exterminator!

9:27 AM  
Blogger Maurice Broaddus said...

indeed, thoughts guided by chaos sounds like a lot of my creative process, too.

i've always had the conceit in my reviews that all stories, no matter the worldview they come from, touches on the same basic themes and connect back to God. my goal is to view stories through my worldview and try to make that connection. how honest it is, well, i guess you can judge that. because what some may see as totally non-redemptive, i may see as the point of that particular story.

9:57 AM  
Anonymous maskofloki said...

Great - comments are working again and there's a reply! Yes: I think C S Lewis (I've read all his philosophy) would definitely know what you meant about seeing the (J-C) God-centred elements of other cultures and beliefs! Only, Loki-like, I've pointed out a snag: there is in pc-speak these days a thing called "cultural appropriation"! How do you counter that? And - to aid my and others' comprehension you'll have to clarify what you mean about "what some may see as totally non-redemptive, I may see as the whole point of the story" - examples? Another interesting point: I'm not sure how big a fan of this particular book you are in fact, because you in conclusion admit that in its original edition it wasn't "worth the price of admission"! I like all my books to be worth the cover price. And one doesn't look for comic-strip-type things in a library. Well I don't: though one sometimes finds some. So - tried the Miéville yet? I assure you, that's worth at least the paperback price, whether you can take steampunk or

12:46 PM  
Blogger Maurice Broaddus said...

some might judge something by, say, wrath james white as something completely non-redemptive. his work is often violent and his views are atheistic humanist. but often, his work reflects mans depravity to his fellow man, thus being the point. it's a poor example, but once again i find myself under the deadline gun and that was the first thing that sprang to the top of my head. (plus, i'm betting many stories in my upcoming anthology folks would find non-redemptive).

i haven't tried mieville yet, but i'm sure i'll be reading "the city and the city" next year. considering i'm expanding my steampunk story into a novel, i doubt i'll have any problem with it.

12:54 PM  
Anonymous maskofloki said...

or leave it (steampunk): one thing for sure is Perdido St. Station will leave you with a head buzzing full of ideas and moral and other questions: more so than Arkham or (sadly) any graphic novel will. (Maybe Persepolis?) I'm talking SERIOUS fantasy, man! Let me explain what I mean by the cover price remark: "c'mere, listen, listen" as ledger said in his joker role (some of it wonderfully lucid - least he avoided the obvious route of playing it all ranty and shouty!) See, when I was young and poor in recession-hit GB (only thing that's changed is the date!) I didn't want to spend £10-£15 of any money I managed to scrape together on something boring, depressing, contrived, pretentious, empty, nihilistic, you name it, anyway anything from that list. I would be far more likely to say: "now *why* should I spend my money on this?" and "what does it have to offer me - or any young person?" You see! Those being the questions the modern comic book/graphic novel industry really needs to answer, if

1:35 PM  
Anonymous maskofloki said...

.. if the comics industry wishes to survive and prosper, I meant to say! It has to cater to folks other than manic-depressives... Sorry we're crossing! Well seeing as you've dealt with a couple of points of mine, I'll respond to yours - but first a step back to the book/ review - why for example should a story be about the "horrors" of insanity (esp. in a very fantasy setting: why shouldn't it conversely be about the freedoms of "insanity" - and who decides what the parameters of sanity in fact are? Like, Richard Dawkins probably thinks all pagans are mad, when he isn't busy denying their contemporary existence!) Oh: you haven't yet heard/read all my theories have you: like for instance that the Joker actually enjoys being the Joker (least he would in my reimagination: why? Because he's a Trickster and they always do - I'll show everybody in my own good time - just be patient!) I'm glad you like steampunk and will be writing your own: would that be Pimp my Airship? What a wizard title: bet they

2:22 PM  
Anonymous maskofloki said...

they don't let you keep it for a novel! Yeah what was I saying: about the insanity thing: I'm glad because Miéville has given me a way into showing this to you which I should have spotted before: only you'll have to have read PSS: which I'm sure you haven't. (Don't start with The City; that's not a steampunk novel, who told you it was? The Bas-Lag novels starting with PSS are his steampunk hits! The City and The City is rather a "literary" detective novel with sf elements as it appears to be set in two dimensions at once.. hence the repeated title! If you don't want to start with the Bas-Lags you might start with his first novel King Rat which is somewhat Gaimanesque; though not his fans' favourite. Just telling you!) Anyway: in the aforementioned PSS, the issue is similar to the one I brought up; *only at issue is not mental but physical deformity!* (The world itself is too wacked to consider many people nuts!) The linking factor is the idea of "sin" and indeed crime: for in this

3:11 PM  
Anonymous maskofloki said...

world they have a particularly horrific grafting technology called Remaking; in which anything can be mixed with anything: human, animal, "xenian" or machine: and which the dystopian government of the main human city, New Crobuzon, can and do inflict on anyone they (don't) like; usually criminals (ie mostly poor people), sometimes so they can fulfil industrial functions, but mostly just to punish them. So basically they have a lot of freaks called Remade walking around: most socially stigmatized; some few are elective and one assumes are not. Some of these Remade are however rebels who are not content to submit to their lot: they are usually escapees from wherever; they are bandits and some are freedom fighters like Jack Half-a-prayer (oh you'll love him - I did, pity he's only a minor char: not a religious char. btw, though Bas-Lag has half a million religions, most polytheistic *satisfied smirk*). These last "freaks" dub themselves fReemade. Most have adjusted to their particular mutilation/modification

4:38 PM  
Anonymous maskofloki said...

and have no wish to be returned to "normality" (though that might be difficult anyway.) Some even wish to take their "deformities" all the way: eg there is a char. in the third book who wants to become completely amphibious - go figure! Sound like your kinda steampunk?! What I think Miéville is doing here is a direct (but non-platitudinous) comment on disability and all types of stigma; and he's basically on the side of the disabled who are unapologetic and the freaks who say "up yours": the ultimate novel against body fascism! (thus linking in with that Ugly Betty conversation we were having!) So - can Morrison equal that? I doubt it: HIS books tend to ANTI-disabled statements; and just because you're writing about 40s-created comic book chars. doesn't mean you have to present them all unrelievedly as Satan incarnate! This is where Morrison falls down, lazily, and Miéville doesn't. (Though the connection between deformity and crime exists in both men's work; doubtless going back to old archetypes which tend

5:36 PM  
Anonymous maskofloki said...

which associated ugliness with sin! Anyway: that's my plug for Miéville! Back to what you were saying: your example wasn't bad, just vaguish, as it mentioned no specific story. Wrath - I know Wrath! Least I know his blog. I have a pretty fair idea of the stuff he writes but have never read a solo novel by him. I suppose I should stay away from the extreme stuff if it is bleak, and not busy and bolshie like China! I am however sure that Wrath can out-write most people at DC - and actually, I'd be willing to bet that he finds most comics juvenile - correct/incorrect? He seems a serious kind of guy. I suppose if he is not a Christian and not a progressive his work would not tend to redemption. (Non-Christian example: The Birdman Of Alcatraz.) Congrats on meeting the deadline for your second trilogy volume; that anthology looks super actually; I had better say so where everybody can see it; please publish all above submitted comments else this dialogue (semi-monologue) will look silly; please don't think I

7:23 PM  
Anonymous maskofloki said...

am being cheeky; I'm not trying to; but you can take my word as far as British steampunk is concerned! oh and this site still has a major delay between comments being approved and them appearing on the main page. just thought I'd point that out...I think that's all here for now - phew!

8:15 PM  
Anonymous maskofloki said...

Unlucky 13! You did miss one, about 4 posts up! About Remade, fReemade and Jack Half-a-prayer! None of the review makes sense without it! Hey: if you find my mind confusing, busy and chaotic you'll find Miéville even more so! You ought to dare to read the Bas-Lag books! Some less hardy souls have been known to give up before page 100! Someone on amazon said he gave the first one till just past that to captivate him: it did! Be warned; the boggle factor is high! But so was Marco Polo's! Don't read all the reviews on there though: idiots put spoilers on them, don't you find?

2:40 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home